What are the benefits of the MIT Open Source license?

A significant benefit of using the MIT license is that it serves both sides of the debate equally well. Some developers feel the GNU GPL licenses are too liberal, while others think all software should eventually become proprietary. Due to the MIT License’s open language, it’s suitable for both community developers and teams that want to produce propriety software using existing pieces of MIT licensed code.

snyk.io

What are the MIT license terms and conditions?

The primary terms and conditions of the MIT license are to grant permissions and indemnify developers for future use. Specifically, it grants any person who obtains a copy of the software and associated files the right to use, copy, modify, merge, distribute, publish, sublicense, and sell copies of the software.

snyk.io

The only condition required to use the software is to include the same copyright notice in all copies or any substantial portions of the software. The final portion of the text provides for limitations and revokes any warranty implied by sharing the code. 

snyk.io

Full text on the official website below:

mit-license.org – MIT License



The Foundations of the GPL

Nobody should be restricted by the software they use. There are four freedoms that every user should have:

  • the freedom to use the software for any purpose,
  • the freedom to change the software to suit your needs,
  • the freedom to share the software with your friends and neighbors, and
  • the freedom to share the changes you make.

When a program offers users all of these freedoms, we call it free software.

gnu.org

Full text on the official website below:

gnu.org – License v3


The 2.0 version of the Apache License, approved by the ASF in 2004, helps us achieve our goal of providing reliable and long-lived software products through collaborative, open-source software development.


Why chose the Apache License?

Anybody can make use of it.
For Open Source business.
Can be used, in any environment one wants and in any way.
Build an open and equal community around software.
Contributions are voluntary,  you are not expected to provide assistance or support for them.
And more,…


Full text on the official website below:

apache.org – Licenses 2.0


Creative Commons Attribution 4.0


Table Of Content:


Creative Commons licenses give everyone a standardized way to grant the public permission to utilise their artistic work.

Creative Commons licenses has several sub types: CC BY, CC BY-SA, CC BY-NC, CC BY-NC-SA, CC BY-ND, CC BY-NC-ND, CC0.


Terms glossary:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

CC License Chooser

FAQS

What does the CC “non-commercial” license allow you to do?

Generally speaking anything under this license is to be used for private use only.

What dose court say about, what is allowed under CC “non-commercial”?

This is somewhat open for interpretation.

There have been is a courtroom judgment to give you a idea. One specific case features ‘Flicker’ image released within CC- NC licence used by a non profits radio station.

Final word in this case was, is in fact any use that ‘s not strictly planned for private usage, in the courtroom, it can be regarded as commercial. There for reimbursement, might be a required to the creator of the artwork

Source:
https://www.techdirt.com/2014/03/27/german-court-says-creative-commons-non-commercial-licenses-must-be-purely-personal-use/
https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Verstoss-gegen-CC-Lizenz-Deutschlandradio-muss-zahlen-2151308.html


Full text on the official website below:

creativecommons.org – Licenses 4.0